Thursday, March 20, 2014

Pastor's Blog

Blog »    

Thursday, March 20, 2014



"You have heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.'  But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father in heaven”   Matthew 5:43-45 (NIV)  

What does it mean to “love your enemies”?    Scott McKnight puts it this way, Love is “a rugged commitment to be with someone as someone who is for that person’s good and to love them unto God’s formative purposes”.

“With”      “for”      “unto”  

If this is correct and I think it is, then it would mean that avoidance is not a good option.  Although a cooling off period is often necessary, separation doesn’t normally contribute to love.   Avoidance usually builds more walls.  I need to commit myself in some way shape or form to be around or with or attentive to or somehow sometimes to be in the presence of those I’m at odds with so that I can demonstrate that I long for and am working for the long term good of that person.    This is an ethic, or behavior that far, far surpasses today’s American ethic of tolerance.   People don’t need tolerated, they need loved.   My goal should be not to tolerate enemies, but to strive for them to become the sort of person God wants them to be.  

Perhaps you have someone who fits into the broad category of “enemy”.   What might be your starting point if you are ready to actually believe that . . .   1.  Jesus knows what he’s talking about.   2.   What He says actually leads to a more blessed life than I’m living now. ?    Can you find ways to simply be around that person or those persons on some regular basis so that your interactions can be at least more normalized?   Can you set aside regular time to pray for that person?  

“Lord, forgive us for our avoidance.   Forgive us for creating in our minds persons who are “other”, who are “against us” or against whom we find ourselves.   Lord, lead me into the presence of my enemies, not to feast in their presence (the bad part of Psalm 23) but to pray that they will feast in Your presence, and with that to “surpass the righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees”.  Amen”

 

Comment    

For more:   follow on Twitter @jefflampl  

Wednesday, March 19, 2014

Pacifism?

Blog »    Pacifism?  

Wednesday, March 19, 2014


“But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. 
If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also”.
Matthew 5:39 (NIV)
 

Some believe that Jesus is talking here only about how the Christian handles personal injury.   Others believe that Jesus is giving a rationale for Christian Pacifism.    What do you think?   Those who believe Jesus is arguing for a Christian Ethic to guide a nation face the following dilemma;  

“This is the dilemma: on the one hand going to war causes terrible evils, but on the other hand not going to war permits them. Whichever horn one chooses to sit on, the sitting should not be comfortable. Allowing evils to happen is not necessarily innocent, any more than causing them is necessarily culpable. Omission and commission are equally obliged to give an account of themselves. Both stand in need of moral justification”  Nigel Bigger “In Defense of War”  

However, to write off pacifism as naïve, unrealistic and impractical is (I think) disrespectful to Ghandi, Dietrich Bonhoeffer and early Church martyrs.   Further it seems to me that Just War Theory (Augustine) is used as an easy way to justify the violence of war when my comfortable world is threatened.   I think that we 21st Americans are way, way, way to comfortable with violence.   Just last night I heard a commercial for the new movie “300”.   The promo said, “Watch it in 3D, it will leave you screaming and hungry for more”.   It appealed to our thirst for violence.   Do you remember Presidential Candidate John McCain singing to the tune of “Barbara Ann”, “bomb, bomb, bomb . . . bomb, bomb, bomb Iran” on Television?  

Would Jesus advocate the demilitarization of America?   Would Jesus tell you to defend yourself if your home were being invaded?   I do think these questions should at least make us think.   I also think that whatever our conclusion about going to war as a nation or defending oneself personally, we should not ever allow ourselves the comfort of knowing we are right.  Instead I think the best we can do is follow Jesus, repentantly, asking forgiveness for whatever self justifications are present in our actions.  

What do you think?

“Lord, forgive us all for our over the top tolerance of and even participation in things which glorify violence against persons of any sorts whom you love and who are your children.   Lord, bring to mind ways that I can reject the world of violence and enter your world of peacemaking.  Amen”

 

Comment    

For more:   follow on Twitter @jefflampl  

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Don't Get Mad, Get Even???

Blog »   Don't Get Mad, Get Even???  

Tuesday, March 18, 2014   Jeff Lampl


"You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.' But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well.  If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you."
                                                     
Matthew 5:38-42 (NIV)
 

What do you do when someone harms you physically, emotionally, economically or in some other way?  

Jesus continues teaching us how to flourish in God’s good world.   In the Beatitudes He taught us that the good life of the Kingdom is available to anyone who wants it.    Not only that, whoever accepts His offer finds himself among those make the world work (light and salt of the earth).   Jesus then tells us how anger, lust, wrecked marriages, and verbal manipulation ruin our joy.    Basically Jesus is saying.   Trust me on this.  I won’t be easy but it will be good.    

Now He tells us to skip revenge.   The old way was “eye for an eye,”  reciprocation through equalization, responding to an injury in kind, nothing more, nothing less.  But as always Jesus rejects “at least I didn’t act on my anger” by telling us that the Kingdom of God is not about what we don’t do.  

The Kingdom of God is about a new heart and that new heart, new love, new other-centeredness is achieved through practicing Kingdom practices.   People who are alive in God’s Good Kingdom see themselves in God’s hands.  They see the humanity and limitations of their enemies and see them under God.   They are learning to view others as Jesus did (“Father, forgive them because they don’t know what they are doing”)  

"Lord, I need help with this.   I want to see others as you see them, out of touch with the reality of the Kingdom, even as victims of life under the control of the 'Prince of this world'.     My emotions get in the way and simply choosing to “not do” something doesn’t work.   Help me to act in some concrete loving way toward “an enemy” this week.  Thank you Lord.  Amen"  

 

Comment    

For more:   follow on Twitter @jefflampl  

Monday, March 17, 2014

Trusting Transparency

Blog »    Trusting Transparency 

Monday, March 17, 2014   Jeff Lampl



"Again, you have heard that it was said to the people long ago, 'Do not break your oath, but keep the oaths you have made to the Lord.' But I tell you, Do not swear at all . . . . Simply let your 'Yes' be 'Yes,' and your 'No,' 'No'; anything beyond this comes from the evil one."
                                                      
Matthew 5:33-37 (NIV)
 

Why do so many of us say things like “by God” or “I swear by all that’s holy” or “Jeeeeezus Kuuriist!”?   Why do we invoke God to damn others?   Of course part of it is habit.   Starting in my early teens I developed a mouth around my friends that rarely produced a sentence without profanity.   But where did the habit come from?  I think there’s more to it than simply saying, “I learned it from others”.    

Sometimes we are trying to impress others with our reliability and sincerity. In doing so we are trying to convince others of what we are saying and thereby attempting to get our own way.  It’s a form of manipulation.  In other cases we display our contempt of something or someone and punctuate our anger about something, once again attempting to steer an outcome in my direction.  We are trying to override the will or judgment of the other person rather than leaving that person free to judge or decide on his or her own.  Additionally taking the name of the Lord in vain uses God’s name without respect  and love for Him.   As Dallas Willard points out, “it is an inherently wrong approach to other human beings”  

The antidote?   Jesus tells us that one of the crucial practices we need to adopt in order to experience the happy life of the Kingdom of God is to let our yes be yes and our no be no.   I am not to seek to manipulate outcomes or to override the will of others.  Jesus tells us to state what we want with as much simplicity, transparency, honesty, kindness, and desire to respect the freedom of the other as possible.   Am I more interested in honoring the other than I am in getting what I want?   Am I willing to accept an outcome that I don’t want.   Am I willing actually to trust that God is involved when I don’t try to manipulate the result that I want?  

Lord, help me to be attentive to my motives when I am in conversation with others.  Help me to be transparent, no hidden agenda, no manipulation of others.  Most of all, Lord, help me to place my life in your hands.  Help me to trust that it is actually, safe, best and part of flourishing in the Kingdom of God to just let my “yes” be “yes” and my “no” be “no”.  Amen
 

Comment    

For more:   follow on Twitter @jefflampl  

Friday, March 14, 2014

Divorce

 Blog »   


                                                                             
"It has been said, 'Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a certificate of divorce.'
But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, causes her to become an adulteress, and anyone who marries the divorced woman commits adultery”
                          Matthew 5:31-32 (NIV)
 

It is commonly said that Christians divorce at the same rate as non-Christians. We’ve all heard that, 1 in 2 marriages end in divorce.  Yet research found in Christians Are Hate-Filled Hypocrites . . .and Other Lies You’ve Been Told, shows that couples who are active in their faith are much less likely to divorce.  “Active conservative protestants” who attend church regularly are actually 35% less likely to divorce than those who have no religious preferences. “Nominal” Christians, however, those who simply call themselves Christians but so not actively engage with the faith, are actually 20% more likely than the general population to get divorced.  As always actual commitment has power in it, but nominal faith leaves us worse off in various ways than no faith at all.  

Jesus recognized this of course.  He was always commanding followers to “all in”, nowhere more than in marriage.  Starting in Genesis 2 and reiterated in Ephesians 5 marriage is an image of the commitment of Jesus Christ to the Church, and image of inseparable oneness.   Yet he nevertheless allowed for the “out” of adultery.   Paul add another “out”, the desertions of an unbelieving spouse.   All of this leads me to two conclusions.    

First, marriage is sacred, perhaps even sacramental as the Roman Catholics assert.  Therefore any divorce must be considered a breach of Image of God.    Even adultery is forgivable.  Marriage is where we grow up and grow past our me oriented lives and learn how live for someone else beyond ourselves, just as Jesus did so for us.  

Second,  in Judaism a permissible divorce entails permissible remarriage. So to grant a divorce in Jesus’ and Paul’s days was to grant remarriage.   In Jesus’ reiteration of the inviolability of the marriage covenant, he simply states the obvious reality of second marriages.  

Third, it seems to me that there is a “Grace trajectory” here (and in 1 Corinthians 7).  I almost never advise divorce, but I admit that there have been times when a relationship has been abusive to the point of danger and at those times, after long periods of separation, with the hope of repentance and change on the part of the abuser simply gone, that divorce seems to be a sad, reluctant but forgivable option.  

Of one thing I am certain.   Jesus would affirm “I just don’t love him anymore” as a reason for divorce no more than he affirmed loose first century attitudes toward divorce.


Comment    

For more:   follow on Twitter @jefflampl  

Thursday, March 13, 2014

Does This Woman have Anything to Teach Us?


Blog »    Does This Woman Have Anything to Teach Us? 

Thursday, March 13, 2014



“You have heard the commandment that says, ‘You must not commit adultery.’
But I say, anyone who even looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery with her in his heart.”
 
                        Matthew 5:27-30 (NLT)  

"Don’t be concerned about the outward beauty of fancy hairstyles, expensive jewelry, or beautiful clothes.  You should clothe yourselves instead with the beauty that comes from within, the unfading beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is so precious to God”
                                                   
1 Peter 3:3-6 (NLT)  

“First, don’t miss watching this provocative and brilliantly done two minute video!. Does she have something to teach us?        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3a7ftZZAew    

“Second read the following comments on Muslim and Christian commonalities by Robert P. George, Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton University.   It’s a good challenge from a conservative to other conservatives to see open our eyes to ways in which Christians and Muslims can and sometimes do stand together.  

“I am a Catholic. My Church teaches me to esteem our Muslim friends and to work with them in the cause of promoting justice and moral values. I am happy to stand with them in defense of what is right and good. And so I stand with the young woman in the above video in defense of modesty, chastity, and piety, just as I stand with Muslims like my dear friends Shaykh Hamza Yusuf and Dr. Suzy Ismail against the killing of unborn children and the evil of pornography, and with my equally dear friend Asma Uddin of the Becket Fund in defense of religious freedom. In the great document Nostra Aetate, we Catholics are taught the following by the fathers of the Second Vatican Council:  

The Church has also a high regard for the Muslims. They worship God, who is one, living and subsistent, merciful and almighty, the Creator of heaven and earth, who has also spoken to men. They strive to submit themselves without reserve to the decrees of God, just as Abraham submitted himself to God’s plan, to whose faith Muslims link their own. Although not acknowledging Jesus as God, they revere him as a prophet; his virgin Mother they also honor, and even at times devoutly invoke. Further, they await the Day of Judgment and the reward of God following the resurrection of the dead. For this reason they highly esteem an upright life and worship God, especially by way of prayer, almsgiving, and fasting.

Over the centuries many quarrels and dissensions have arisen between Christians and Muslims. The sacred Council now pleads with all to forget the past, and urges that a sincere effort be made to achieve mutual understanding; for the benefit of all men, let them together preserve and promote peace, liberty, social justice and moral values.
 

Let us heed this teaching. Let us, Muslims and Christians alike, forget past quarrels and stand together for righteousness, justice, and the dignity of all. Let those of us who are Christians reject the untrue and unjust identification of all Muslims with those evildoers who commit acts of terror and murder in the name of Islam. Let us be mindful that it is not our Muslim fellow citizens who have undermined public morality, assaulted our religious liberty, and attempted to force us to comply with their ideology on pain of being reduced to the status of second-class citizens. Let all of us—Christians, Jews, Muslims, and people of other faiths who “esteem an upright life” and seek truly to honor God and do His will—embrace each other, seeking “mutual understanding for the benefit of all men [and working] together to preserve and promote peace, liberty, justice, and moral values.”

Through the great work being done by my friend Jennifer Bryson—who is a devout Christian and a great American patriot who spent two years as an interrogator at Guantanamo—I have met hundreds of religiously observant Muslims over the past several years and many are now my close friends. They are among the finest people I know. Like faithful Christians and Jews, they seek to honor God and do His will. They work, as we do, to inculcate in their children the virtues of honesty, integrity, self-respect and respect for others, hard work, courage, modesty, chastity, and self-control. They do not want to send their sons off to wars. They do not want their children to be suicide bombers. They do not want to impose Islam on those who do not freely embrace it. They thank God for the freedom they enjoy in the United States and they are well aware of its absence in the homelands of many of those who are immigrants. It is not right for us to make them feel unwelcome or to suggest that their faith disables them from being loyal Americans. It is unjust to stir up fear that they seek to take away our rights or to make them afraid that we seek to take away theirs. And it is foolish to drive them into the arms of the political left when their piety and moral convictions make them natural allies of social conservatives. (A majority of American Muslims voted for George W. Bush in the 2000 election. A majority of the general voting population did not.)  

I admire Muslim women and all women who practice the virtue of modesty, whether they choose to cover their hair or not. There are many ways to honor modesty and practices vary culturally in perfectly legitimate ways. Men and women are called to serve each other in various ways, and women who refuse to pornify themselves, especially in the face of strong cultural pressures and incentives to do so, honor themselves and others of their sex while also honoring those of us of the opposite sex. They uphold their own dignity and the dignity of their fellow human beings, male and female alike.

I have no doubt that in certain cultures, including some Muslim cultures, the covering of women is taken to an extreme and reflects a very real subjugation, just as in sectors of western culture, the objectification of women (including the sexualization of children at younger and younger ages) by cultural pressures to pornify reflects a very real (though less direct and obvious) subjugation. But, of course, we are in the happy position of not having to choose between the ideology of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and that of Hugh Hefner.

Of course, defenders of pornification claim that they are “liberating women” and “celebrating female beauty.” The liberation claim is the very reverse of the truth. As for “celebrating female beauty,” let me ask you this: Is there an actress in all of Hollywood who when appearing at one of these absurd awards shows dressed in a see-through gown, bra-less and wearing a thong, can compare with the beautiful young Muslim woman in the video I posted? I submit that there is none. Oh, yes, to be sure, the actress will appeal to something in her male viewers. (I’m a man. Take it from me.) But it will not be their sense or appreciation of beauty. It will be something much lower and brutely appetitive. Their experience will be one in which who she actually is as a person is utterly submerged. The men viewing her will not be drawn in to wonder about her thoughts and feelings, her experiences of joy and sorrow, her strengths and vulnerabilities—the things that actually make her the unique person she is. Their experience will, quite literally, be an experience of de-personalized desire—the very definition of lust.

 

Comment    

For more:   follow on Twitter @jefflampl  

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Jesus and Old Testament Really Weird Laws

  Blog »    Jesus and Old Testament Really Weird Laws 

Wednesday, March 12, 2014   Jeff Lampl


"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.  I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.
‘Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven”             Matthew 5:17-20 (NIV)

 

First, I encourage you to listen to the song which I referenced in Sunday’s message.   A really, really big part of me thinks that this is greatest song ever composed and ever sung.    Here it is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnaZlwme8Sw
 

That kind of captures Jesus big point in the first part of the Sermon on Mount.   The sequence of his sermon is essential.   God’s free offer of Grace to every person on the planet is the context for every thing he says in chapters 5, 6, and 7.  

Next Jesus tells his audience that every detail of the Old Testament Law is being fulfilled by God’s having come to earth in Himself.   So, what about the laws that mandate capital punishment for a teen who’s cussed out his mother, or no trimming of the beard or no cooking a goat in his mother’s milk?   The former is about family respect and behavior, the second is about people noticing that you’re different because of God, and the third is a reminder that we are not well off when we mix allegiances (cheese doesn’t mix with meat as a metaphor for not mixing priorities).  

Jesus arrives and gets to the heart of Law.   Law is only an imperfect method of arranging  life so that we self oriented people are organized into not getting in each other’s way.   Jesus is about something way bigger than that.   He came to change hearts, motivations, character, our inner selves, so that, much more than self policing,  each of us grows an inner ‘want to’, an inner desire to achieve the best for others.   Jesus seeks to change every human  motivation from avoidance of bad consequences for myself (law) to offering the best I have for the best of of others, even at my own expense (Grace)  

“Lord, please change me in that way.   Move me to care more about  the welfare of others, even over and above my own.   Lord as I proceed through this study on the Sermon on The Mount, please be my guide.   I want, Jesus, to be mentored by you.   Take me under your wing and transform me from what I am now into what you intend for me to become”  Amen

Comment    

For more:   follow on Twitter @jefflampl